Information about Catherina’s life is scant.[1] She possibly was a sister of the artist François Knibbergen (c. 1596 - after 1664), who had travelled to Italy and was recorded in the Amsterdam painters’ guild in 1626 and by 1629 lived in The Hague where he joined the local guild. The often Italianate landscapes that François and Catherine painted are so alike that unsigned works are easily confused. The stylistic similarities of their works indeed suggest that they were related and moreover, as François probably was the older artist, he is likely to have taught Catherine.
Although she is now little-known, Catherine was held in high regards in her own day. In 1634, she was praised in a poem by Pieter Nootmans (1600 - before 1652), who called her a ‘famous artful paintress’ (vermaerde Konst-rijcke Schilderesse).[2] That reputation must have burgeoned in the preceding years.[3] An Alpine landscape on panel that went under the hammer at Sotheby’s in New York on 20 May 1993 (no. 1) and which is stylistically very close to Catherina Knibbergen, bears a partly preserved signature consisting of “[?].k”, and the last two digits of 1622 (fig. 1). If this is indeed a work by Catherine’s hand, it would mean she was already painting by the early 1620s, which would put her year of birth at around 1600 at the latest. Catherine remained active for many decades and in an unknown year joined the painters’ confraternity Pictura in The Hague that was founded in 1656. In 1665, she married the army officer Gerard de Witte and in 1672 she is recorded as his widow.
Fig. 2, attributed to Catherina Knibbergen, Alpine View with Figures,
1622, panel, 13.3 x 18.4 cm, present whereabouts unknown
In spite of her long productivity, almost no signed works by Catherine have come down to us.[4] Therefore, this small work provides an anchor point for the study of her oeuvre. The landscape view is totally devoid of human presence, which lends it a sense of mystery. The water of a brook and of waterfalls rushes towards the foreground. The distance shows an open panoramic vista which dissolves near a hazy horizon. The execution is remarkably free, with brushmarking throughout. The atmospheric effects are however distinctly rendered with great sensitivity. The play of light bespeaks a sophisticated understanding of the workings of sunlight at a certain point of time during the day, a concern for atmospheric verisimilitude also apparent in the landscapes of Italianate painters such as Jan Asselijn (1610-52) and Jan Both (c. 1615-52). Singular as they are, Catherine’s and François’s views, do betray a debt to a variety of artists. The strongly diagonal composition here is an echo of the famous Aurora landscape by Adam Elsheimer (1578-1610), which was engraved by his pupil Hendrick Goudt (c. 1583-1648; fig. 2) and which had a tremendous influence on Dutch landscape specialists.[5] The bare trees in the right middle zone reinforce the inhospitable flavour of the scenery. Uninhabitable landscapes constituted a fascinating subgenre within landscape painting explored by such artists as Esaias van de Velde (1587-1630) and Hercules Segers (c. 1589/90 - ? 1633/40).
Fig. 2, Hendrick Goudt after Adam Elsheimer,
“Aurora”, engraving
It cannot be ruled out that our painting once had a companion piece and that this is one of the other extremely rare signed paintings by Catherine, which has the exact same dimensions and shows a very similar but mirrored composition. Even the horizons are on the same height (fig. 3).[6]
Fig. 3, Catherina Knibbergen, left Hilly River Landscape with Figures and on the right our painting. The one of the left; present whereabouts unknown
Notes
[1] See for a biography E. Buijsen (ed.), Haagse schilders in de Gouden Eeuw: het Hoogsteder lexicon van alle schilders werkzaam in Den Haag 1600-1700, The Hague 1998, p. 321. For a long time, Catherine Knibbergen was confused with another female painter in The Hague, Catherine van der Snap, who in 1643 married a Lucas de Hen, and was henceforth mentioned as Catherine de Hen. She remarried in 1653, coincidentally, also with a Gerard de Witte, just like Catherine Knibbergen. All of this is fleshed out in: https://resources.huygens.knaw.nl/vrouwenlexicon/lemmata/data/Knibbergen
[2] Pieter Nootmans, Jeugdige minne-spiegel, The Hague 1634, p. 149.
[3] By contrast, she is neglected by most of the art historical handbooks for instance B. Haak, The golden age: dutch painters of the seventeenth century, Amsterdam 1984. Nor is she mentioned in the Wolfgang Stechow’s standwork on Dutch landscape art: Dutch landscape painting of the seventeenth century, London 1966. Hans Ulrich Beck also remained silent on her in: Künstler um Jan van Goyen: Maler und Zeichner, Doornspijk 1991.
[4] A similar but larger and monogrammed (c.k.) panel (41.5 x 58 cm) was in 1971 sold from the A.L. Lúnden collection in Stockholm as by Cornelis Ketel: note and photo RKD, The Hague.
[5] Elsheimer’s revolutionary painting of around 1606 is preserved in Braunschweig, Herzog-Anton-Ulrich-Museum.
[6] Formerly with the dealer Nystad, Lochem and then in the collection Mr. C.H. Muntz, Wassenaar. See: Nederlandse landschappen uit de zeventiende eeuw/Dutch Landscapes at Dordrecht, exh. cat. Dordrecht (Dordrechts Museum) 1963, no. 65.